Skip to content

Hanging Together

the OCLC Research blog

  • Home
  • About
Main Menu
Libraries / Metadata / Research Note

New skill sets for metadata management

April 17, 2017May 11, 2017 - by Karen Smith-Yoshimura

That was the topic discussed recently by OCLC Research Library Partners metadata managers, initiated by Jennifer Baxmeyer of Princeton, Dawn Hale of Johns Hopkins University and MJ Han of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Educating and training catalogers has been at the forefront of many discussions in the metadata community. Today’s changing landscape calls for skill sets needed by both new professionals entering the field and seasoned catalogers to successfully transition to the emerging linked data and semantic web environment. Catalogers are learning about and experimenting with BIBFRAME while remaining responsible for traditional bibliographic control of collections. Metadata specialists utilize tools for metadata mapping, remediation, and enhancement. They identify and map semantic relationships among assorted taxonomies to make multiple thesauri intelligible to end users. For the more technical aspects of metadata management, we increasingly see competition for talent from other industries. This may intensify as metadata becomes more central to various areas of government, non-profit, and private enterprise.

Managers want to focus less on specific schema and more on metadata principles that can be applied to a range of different formats and environments. Desired soft skills included problem solving, effective collaboration, willingness—even eagerness—to try new things, understanding researchers’ needs, and advocacy. Although some metadata specialists have always enjoyed experimenting with new approaches, they lack the time to learn new tools or methodologies while keeping up with their routine work assignments. We should promote metadata as an exciting career option to new professionals in venues such as library schools and ALA’s New Members Roundtable. Emphasizing that metadata encompasses much more than library cataloging can increase its appeal, for example: entity identification, descriptive standards used in various academic disciplines, and describing born-digital, archival and research data that can interact with the semantic Web. As one participant noted, “We bring order out of a vacuum.”

Metadata increasingly is being created outside the library by academics and students who receive minimal training, leading to a need for more catalogers with record maintenance skills. Participants noted the need for technical skills such as simple scripting, data remediation, and identity management to reconcile equivalents across multiple registries.  Frequently mentioned sources of instruction include Library Juice Academy, MARCEdit tutorials, Lynda.com, Library of Congress Training Webinars, ALCTS Webinars, Code Academy, Software Carpentry and conferences such as Code4Lib and Mashcat. W3C’s recently published Data on the Web Best Practices and Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist were recommended reading. Crucial to the success of such training is to be able to quickly apply what has been learned. If new skills are not used, people forget what they have learned. Staff feel frustrated when they have invested the time to learn something that they cannot use in their daily work regularly.

We’ve seen a big shift from relying on instructions from the Library of Congress to self-education from multiple sources. Some approaches mentioned by participants:

  • Emphasize continuity of metadata principles when introducing an expanded scope of work.
  • Take advantage of the Library Workflow Exchange, a site designed to help librarians share workflows and best practices across institutions, including scripts.
  • From the recent Electronic Resources & Libraries Conference: “Don’t wait; iterate!” In other words, rather than waiting until staff have all the required skills, let them do tasks iteratively, learning as they go, so they are ready for new tasks when the time comes.
  • Have small groups of metadata specialists take programming courses together, after which they can continue to meet and discuss ways to apply their new skills to automate routine tasks.
  • Send staff to events such as OCLC’s DEVCONNECT, OCLC Developer Conference being held on 8-9 May 2017 to learn from libraries using OCLC APIs to enhance their library operations and services.
  • Create reading and study groups that include cross-campus or cross-divisional staff.
  • Expand the scope of current work to enable metadata specialists to apply their skills to new domains or terminology, such as using Dublin Core for digital collections. Involve staff in digital projects from the conceptual stage to developing project specifications, quality assurance practices and tool selection. As an added bonus, this fosters collaborative teamwork relationships.
  • Hire graduate students in computer science for short-term tasks such as creating scripts. The students need money and the library needs their skills.

The extent of collaboration with IT or systems staff varies among institutions. Such collaboration is necessary for many reasons, including managing data that is outside the library’s control. Some noted that “cultural differences” exist between the professions: developers tend to be more dynamic and focus on quick prototyping and iteration, while librarians focus first on documenting what is needed and are more “schematic.”  Which is more likely to be successful: teaching metadata specialists IT skills or teaching IT staff metadata principles?  The “holy grail” is to recruit someone with an IT background interested in metadata services. Retaining staff with IT skills is difficult—if they are really good, they can find higher-paying jobs in the private sector. Ideally, metadata managers would like a few staff who have the technical skills to take batch actions on data, or at least know how to use the external tools available to automate as many tasks as possible.

Karen Smith-Yoshimura

Karen Smith-Yoshimura, senior program officer, works on topics related to creating and managing metadata with a focus on large research libraries and multilingual requirements.

http://oclc.org/research/people/smith-yoshimura.html
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Google+
Google+
Email this to someone
email

Related Posts

The Curious Case of Balanced/Equilateral Higher Education Institutions and Potential Implications for Academic Libraries

March 22, 2018March 22, 2018

What’s in a Name? More Than Meets the Eye, or IPEDS: On the Religious Identity of US Colleges and Universities

March 21, 2018March 22, 2018

The OCLC Research Library Partnership: the challenges of developing scholarly services in a decentralized landscape (European edition)

March 7, 2018March 6, 2018

OCLC Research

Hanging Together is the blog of OCLC Research. Learn more about OCLC Research on our website.

Links

  • Lorcan Dempsey's Weblog
  • Next – OCLC Blog
  • OCLC Research
  • OCLC Research Library Partnership
  • WebJunction

Categories

  • Architecture and Standards (64)
  • Archives and Special Collections (174)
  • Digital Preservation (68)
  • Digitization (22)
  • ebooks (4)
  • Equity, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI) (1)
  • Europe (57)
  • Higher Education Future (8)
  • Identifiers (21)
  • Information Literacy (1)
  • Infrastructure (33)
  • Libraries (158)
  • Libraries, Archives, Museums (LAM) (121)
  • Library Management (19)
  • Linked Data (17)
  • Managing the Collective Collection (108)
  • Measurement and Behaviors (40)
  • Metadata (52)
  • Miscellaneous (313)
  • Modeling new services (115)
  • MOOCs (7)
  • Museums (57)
  • OCLC Research Library Partnership (115)
  • Rare Books (7)
  • Renovating Descriptive Practice (115)
  • Research Data Management (8)
  • Research Information Management (32)
  • Research Note (68)
  • Resource Sharing (2)
  • Rightscaling (1)
  • Risk management (6)
  • Searching (40)
  • Software (9)
  • Supporting Scholarship (69)
  • Systemwide Organization (42)
  • Uncategorized (1)
  • User behavior (3)
  • Visual Resources (17)
  • Visualization (1)
  • Wikidata (6)
  • Wikipedia (28)

Share Buttons

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Google+
Google+
Email this to someone
email

Recent Comments

  • Jean Godby on Are distributed models for vocabulary maintenance viable?
  • Constance Malpas on University Futures, Library Futures: a multi-dimensional model of US higher education institutions
  • Carrie Marten on University Futures, Library Futures: a multi-dimensional model of US higher education institutions
  • Rebecca Bryant on The OCLC Research Library Partnership: the challenges of developing scholarly services in a decentralized landscape (European edition)
  • Simon Huggard on The OCLC Research Library Partnership: the challenges of developing scholarly services in a decentralized landscape (European edition)

Recent Posts

  • What’s changed in linked data implementations in the last three years?
  • What metadata managers expect from and value about the Research Library Partnership
  • Are distributed models for vocabulary maintenance viable?
  • Recommended Data Elements for Describing Archived Web Content
  • Two Reports on Web Archiving: Literature Review and Tools Analysis

Admin.

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
  • [Un]Subscribe to Posts
© 2018 OCLC