Skip to content

Hanging Together

the OCLC Research blog

  • Home
  • About
Main Menu
Archives and Special Collections / Digital Preservation / Metadata / Web Archiving

Feedback, please! DRAFT web archiving metadata best practices!

June 1, 2017September 4, 2020 - by Jackie Dooley

As you may know, the OCLC Research Library Partnership Web Archiving Metadata Working Group (WAM) has been working for the past year to draft best practices for web archiving metadata—and voila, our draft report awaits your review.

The audience for these best practices includes librarians, archivists, and any others who create metadata for archived websites. Websites are idiosyncratic in form, structure, and presentation of metadata-worthy information, and these best practices will help practitioners make consistent decisions and thus increase the efficiency of their work.

Although WAM’s charge is to focus on web archiving rather than description of live websites, the report includes much that is relevant to the latter. Libraries and archives create metadata records for both single archived sites and collections of sites, each community employing its traditional standards and practices for cataloging and description. WAM’s best practice recommendations bridge the two approaches. 

The WAM data dictionary is lean (fourteen elements) and can be used either on its own or in concert with library and archival standards that are far more granular. Data element names and definitions were adopted or adapted from existing standards whenever feasible to enhance compatibility. Each element includes a definition, usage guidelines and notes, brief crosswalks to relevant standards, and examples taken directly from extant metadata records.

These were our specific objectives:

  1. Prepare standards-neutral and community-neutral best practices for descriptive metadata for archived web content, taking into account the needs of end users and metadata practitioners.
  2. Develop a lean set of defined data elements (i.e., a data dictionary).
  3. Prepare usage notes to address the peculiarities and ambiguities of websites that have limited the value of existing standards for descriptive metadata.
  4. Ensure that the data elements can be used in concert with other standards that have far more granular data element sets.
  5. Ensure that the guidelines take into account both bibliographic and archival approaches to description.
  6. Recommend a sustainable approach that does not mandate in-depth description or extensive changes to records over time.

The deadline for comments is Friday 9 June; send to dooleyj@oclc.org. Our publication target date is toward the end of July.

Please forward the link to anyone who may be interested. We’re eager to have it reviewed as widely as possible by members of the web archiving and metadata communities to ensure that these best practices are as sound and useful as possible.

Thanks for your help!

Jackie Dooley

Jackie Dooley retired in from OCLC in 2018. She led OCLC Research projects to inform and improve archives and special collections practice.

www.oclc.org/research/people/dooley.html
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

OCLC Research

Hanging Together is the blog of OCLC Research. Learn more about OCLC Research on our website.

Links

  • Lorcan Dempsey's Weblog
  • Next – OCLC Blog
  • OCLC Research
  • OCLC Research Library Partnership
  • WebJunction

Categories

  • Archives and Special Collections (197)
  • Born-Digital Special Collections (14)
  • Collective Collections (118)
  • Data Science (7)
  • Digital Preservation (69)
  • Digitization (24)
  • Equity, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI) (9)
  • Evolving Scholarly Record (11)
  • Higher Education Future (8)
  • Identifiers (34)
  • Infrastructure and Standards Support (101)
  • Libraries (93)
  • Libraries Archives and Museums (128)
  • Libraries in the Enterprise (2)
  • Library Management (7)
  • Linked Data (46)
  • Measurement and Behaviors (44)
  • Metadata (88)
  • Miscellaneous (176)
  • Modeling new services (112)
  • MOOCs (7)
  • Museums (57)
  • Open Access (14)
  • Renovating Descriptive Practice (127)
  • Research Data Management (21)
  • Research Information Management (37)
  • Research Library Partnership (166)
  • Research support (26)
  • Resource Sharing (8)
  • Searching (38)
  • SHARES (6)
  • Social Interoperability (3)
  • Supporting Scholarship (65)
  • Systemwide Organization (42)
  • User Behavior Studies and Synthesis (6)
  • Visual Resources (17)
  • Web Archiving (14)
  • WebJunction (7)
  • Wikimedia (43)

Share Buttons

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email

Recent Comments

  • Chela Metzger on Total Cost of Stewardship: a new publication from the OCLC RLP
  • Merrilee Proffitt on Engaging in “Difficult Conversations” on race: lessons learned from an RLP team practice group
  • Jeff Belliston on Engaging in “Difficult Conversations” on race: lessons learned from an RLP team practice group
  • Gail Thornburg on さようなら (Sayōnara)
  • Ivy Anderson on さようなら (Sayōnara)

Recent Posts

  • Dutch round table on next generation metadata: think bigger than NACO and WorldCat
  • Third English round table on next generation metadata: investing in the utility of authorities and identifiers
  • Mesa redonda sobre metadatos de próxima generación en español: la gestión de las identidades de los investigadores es lo más importante
  • Making strategic choices about library collaboration in RDM
  • Spanish round table on next generation metadata: managing researcher identities is top of mind

Admin.

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2020 OCLC